BQ Amsterdam 5505 technical. The operating system is a system software, managing and coordinating hardware components in the device

Screen Type: IPS (in Plane Switching) is a high-quality liquid crystal matrix that was created to eliminate the main deficiencies of matrices on TN technology. The IPS matrix in all the spectrum most adequately transmits colors at different angles of view, with the exception of some positions also colors. The TN-matrix has the best response than IPS, but NE always. Thus, when moving from gray in gray, the IPS-matrix behaves better to the IPS matrix. Another majority is still resistant to pressing. Touching the TN- or VA matrix will bring to the "excitation" or a certain reaction on the screen. There is no such effect on IPS-Matrice. In addition, ophthalmologists confirm that the IPS matrix is \u200b\u200bmost comfortable for the eyes. Such * E * M * Actually, the IPS matrix brings a bright and sequential picture regardless of the corners of view, the best for work in the intersese, watching movies. But the most important thing is to process images and view photos. LCD (Liquid Crystal Display) - Liquid Crystal Displays. The most first displays used in the mobile devices, and not only in the phones. The main feature is that they have very low power consumption, due to the impossibility of displaying the color image. They do not emit light and therefore telephones upgrade lighting lamps. On some phones there were several different colors of the backlight based on the presence of different LEDs around the perimeter of the display. This extraordinary solution was used, let's say phone Ericsson. A3618. On such a type of displays, pixels are clearly visible, and such displays can not boast such displays. In order to extend the life with such displays, they made them inversion, i.e. The text and symbols were displayed not filled with pixels, but, on the contrary, inactive against the background of filled. Thus, a bright text was obtained on dark background. Currently, this type of displays is used in the cheapest budget models (Nokia 1112) and as an external in some "clamshells" (Samsung D830).

TFT (Thin Film Transistor) - Liquid-crystalline displays based on thin-film transistors with an active matrix. For each pixel, there are three transistors corresponding to three colors (RGB red, green, blue). On the this momentThese are the most common displays that have a number of advantages over other displays. They differ in the minimum response time and rapid development - ever-growing resolution and number of colors. The most common displays data in the middle class phones and above are the most common. Work permits for them: 128x160, 132x176, 176x208, 176x220, 240x320 and other, less common. Examples: Nokia N73 (240x320, 262 thousand colors), Sony Ericsson. K750i (176x220, 262 thousand colors), samsung d900 (240x320, 262 thousand colors). TFT is very rarely used as external display for clamshells.

CSTN (Color Super Twisted Nematic) - Colored liquid crystalline displays with a passive matrix. Each pixel of such a display consists of three combined pixels, which correspond to three colors (RGB). Some time ago, almost all phones with color displays were based, precisely, on such a type. And now the lot of such displays - budget models. The main minus of such displays is their slowness. The undoubted advantage of such displays is their cost, it is significantly lower than TFT. Based on simple logic, it can be assumed that in the future TFT will displacing such a type of displays from the mobile machine market. The evolution of chromaticity of such displays is quite extensive: from 16 to 65536 colors. Examples: Motorola V177 (128x160, 65 thousand colors), Sony Ericsson J100i (96x64, 65 thousand colors), Nokia 2310 (96x68, 65 thousand colors).

UFB (Ultra Fine and Bright) - liquid crystalline displays with increased brightness and contrast on the passive matrix. Can be said that this intermediate option Between CSTN and TFT. This type of displays boasts lower power consumption compared to TFT. For the most part, such displays used Samsung in middle-class phones. This type Displays have not received widespread. Examples: samsung C100/110 (128x128, 65 thousand colors).

TN is one of the TFT screens matrix types. If rude, TN is the simplest and cheap TFT matrices. The viewing angles are the most narrow.

Characteristics

  • Case materials: plastic
  • Operating system: Google Android 5.1
  • Network: GSM / GPRS / EDGE, two Six Carts
  • Processor: 4 kernels, MediaTek MT6580
  • RAM: 1 GB
  • Data storage memory: 8 GB
  • Interfaces: Wi-Fi (B / G / N), Bluetooth 4.0, MICROUSB connector (USB 2.0) for charge / synchronization, 3.5 mm for headset
  • Screen: Capacitive, IPS 5.5 "" with a resolution of 1280x720 Points
  • Camera: 13/5 Mp, flash
  • NAVIGATION: GPS.
  • Optional: Accelerometer, approximation and light sensors, FM radio
  • Batteries: removable, lithium-ion (Li-Ion) 2500 mAh capacity
  • Dimensions: 157x78x9 mm
  • Weight: 197 g
  • Price: 7 000 rubles (Q2 2016)

Contents of delivery

  • Smartphone
  • Network adapter
  • USB cable

Introduction

Not so long ago, a device from the company BQ called Amsterdam appeared on the Russian market. It should be noted that all the names of the devices of this company are geographical, for example, just the other day we had two devices - Los Angeles and Monte Carlo.

The BQ Amsterdam smartphone is now just less than 7,000 rubles and offers the user a large 5.5-inch IPS-screen with HD-resolution, a simple 4-core chipset from MediaTek, only 1 GB of RAM, but sufficient accumulator capacity of 2500 mAh sufficient for such a gadget.

Design, dimensions, control elements

In previous reviews, I already told that smartphones and other BQ devices, one way or another, copy the design of famous brands. If in the case of Los Angeles and Monte Carlo, articles of Samsung, HTC and DooGee were used, the gadget Amsterdam is a typical clone Apple iPhone., not quite good. Eldar Murtazin talked not so long ago about the fake iPhone: he cost in a penny, but it was done that some employees of our edition did not understand the trick when they showed alleged telephone from Apple. C BQ Amsterdam will not be like this: the device reminds the iPhone only with some details. Good or bad, apparently, to judge potential buyers.






The housing is made entirely of plastic and has three colors: golden (front panel of white, gold cover), black (the same color and frontal part) and silver (black plus silver). Plastic is simple, the quality is seconded, like children's toys. Cover of a dark color apparatus - soft-touch, the rest - semi-man plastic.



Dimensions for a 5.5-inch smartphone are rather big - 157x78x9 mm, and weighs the gadget, as if made of metal - almost 200 grams. In the hand lies well due to lower edges and smooth shape of the housing. If the hands are wet (especially relevant now, in the summer, with 9 degrees of heat and a small rain), the phone can slip, the cover would be ...


The assembly is excellent: nothing creaks and not the backlash, the rear area is not aslertained to the battery. I think, with time, paint from the gold BQ will sew the gear of white plastic.

The screen is protected with tempered glass (the manufacturer does not provide detailed data), however, when you buy a device, a protective film will be pasted on it. I tested Amsterdam without her. The display is equipped with a relatively effective oleophobic coating: prints remain, but almost invisible and quickly erased, the finger slides easily.


From above on the front panel there are camera, sensors and a conversational speaker. He is a loud, the interlocutor is not heard not very clear and picking up, the timbre bubnicching, with loud sounds From the side of the interlocutor, the speaker fractures.

Under the display - the standard android touch buttons, the backlight is missing.



Below are the microphone and speaker loud communication, top - microUSB and 3.5 mm connector. Left - two separate buttons for volume control. They are convex, feel good with their fingers. Right - power button. The location of the keys, as it seemed to me, unsuccessful - too high: every time you lock the screen you have to promote the phone down the palm.


From the reverse side there are a camera recessed into the housing, flash, a red BQ logo.


Removable cover, like battery. Under the panel - two slots under the symcards of the Micro format and the connector for installing the microSD memory card.




BQ Amsterdam, Monte Carlo and Los Angeles

Display

This device uses a screen whose diagonal is 5.5 inches. The physical size is 68x121 mm, the frame from above is 17 mm, from the bottom - 20 mm, on the right and on the left - about 4.5 mm. There is an anti-reflective coating, quite effective.

The resolution of the Amsterdam display from BQ - HD, that is, 1280x720 points, aspect ratio - 16: 9, density - 267 pixels per inch. IPS matrix with air layer.

Maximum screen viewing angles, under the slopes, the picture is slightly pale. If you look at the display, rejecting the phone from yourself, you can notice the backlight of the matrix, which is not very good. In general, the illumination is uneven, in some places white spots are visible (dark picture).

Maximum white brightness - 280 kD / m2, maximum brightness of black color - 0.62 cd / m2, contrast - 500: 1.

The image is almost not visible in the light, in the shade - more or less normal.


Corners Reviews




Batteries

IN this device A replaceable battery (lithium-ion) is used for 2500 mAh.

In my mode of operation (infrequent calls and mostly Wi-Fi and 3G) Smartphone "lived" from about 9 am to deep night (to hours or two). In this mode, I listen about 2 hours of music, the screen glows about 3-4 hours. Video playback is about 7-8 hours.

If we are talking about listening to music, then this can be neglected because the battery is 2500 mAh sits about 3-5% per hour on average volume: the battery is discharged faster in standby mode. Toys - about 2 hours.

From regular network adapter The battery is charging for 3 hours 20 minutes.

Communication capabilities

The device only works in 2G / 3G networks (GSM 850/900/1800/1900 MHz, WCDMA 900/2100 MHz): Slot 1 - 2G / 3G, slot 2 - 2G.

The rest is standard for any Android smartphone: Wi-Fi B / G / N, Bluetooth 4.0, USB 2.0 without OTG support. With GPS, Amsterdam has obvious problems: the gadget is hard to find satellites even in a few minutes.

Memory and memory card

Inside there is 1 GB of RAM, usually free about 400 MB. Included 8 GB memory, about 5 GB are available. There is a slot under the MicroSD memory card, the maximum volume is 32 GB.

Cameras

Traditionally, there are two chambers modules: at 13 MP (aperture F2.2) and 5 MP (aperture F2.8). There is one LED flash.

For a device costing less than 7,000 rubles, BQ Amsterdam is quite decent, macro and portrait frames are especially well. Landscapes are somewhat soyl. Noise a little, the drawing is pleasant, sharpness is adequate, dynamic range middle. Focus is not fast, but accurate.

The front camera is not the best (for the budget apparatus will come down), the artifacts are noticeable (apparently, there is a post-processing - an increase in sharpness), characteristic of Sony modules.

The smartphone records rollers in FullHD resolution, the number of frames - 30. The quality is more drawn on HD. Focus is well suited. The self-camera also writes FullHD, but at 20 fps, the quality is good.

Examples of photos

Performance

The BQ Amsterdam model uses a chipset from the Taiwanese company MediaTek - MT6580: 4 kernels, ARM Cortex-A7, technical process - 28 nm, the core frequency is up to 1.3 GHz, the graphics - MALI-400. By the way, the similar processor is set to BQ Los Angeles.

The smartphone does not slow down and is not buggy, no microlags were found. Games go all, but on low or medium settings. It happens that there are no textures in games. In general, from the budget chip to expect something else and not worth it.

About everything in order.

My 6-inch, very non-checked and uncrowded EXPLA "died" after 2.5 years of service (he had glitches and before that, and here - resuscitation was useless and "clinical death" became a fact ... sadness!). In a word, based on the parameters of the predecessor, the working necessities and free money by the budget of thousands of 6 from the strength, the search was launched with such introductory:
1. Big screen (at least 5 inches, ideally - more).
2. Sympathetic "Girl" and "non-bright" design, it is possible at all and not a brand (Ponte I was purple, there would be a decent device, and what letters there on the "ass" - no matter).
3. Good inner memory and the availability of memory extensible large-sized flash drive (my previous phone was using an apple gadget with 16 gigams of built-in memory, but there was little internal, the battery was not filmed, and as a result - at death, I can't pull out the pictures or info that could Calmly be on the flash drive and rearranged to another mobile phone).
4. Smart android.
5. Good bright and juicy screen.
6. And finally - necessarily two SIM cards, for on one I have a mirsty of megaphone, and the second is a worker corporate "horse" for calls to stationary numbers by customers.

Well, naturally, I wanted non-commissioned sincere user feedback on Otzovik left a pleasant impression!

The selection process will not be described - the heaps of online stores were shredded by me in the search, a gadget was chosen with the name in honor of the capital of Holland (in general without any rear thought ☺).

So, a week of delicate acquaintance brought simultaneously and admiration, and disappointment !!! I understand those who wrote with the highest marks, but There is a spoon of tar in honey barrel ☹.

In order:

1. The screen - there is a plus, 5.5 inches. Just in the topic, the fingers are comfortable "choking" on the screen, one hand to control the icons is convenient, everything will get out (on the previous one it was not so simple!).

2. For the design, too, a solid five - a golden rear panel, the white "facade", some refinement - great!

3. Memory is normal, the flash drive was immediately bought and inserted, now, I hope, I will not face my pictures ☺.

4. Android - no questions, everything is clever and flies, if there is a normal mobile Internet or Fai-Waifai ☺. But here I must say that not both slots for SIMIC "are equally useful" - in the first one works only "2 ji", the Internet crawls, as communism to America, but in the second slot with the support of the "3 ji cards" everything is as needed, whistles With a subttage (even in the metro, the Internet catches and works fine!). So the SIM card providing you with the Internet in the mobile phone, insert into the second slot!

5. Screen - Again - yes, bright, juicy, everything seems to be chiki ... but On the second day, two microscopic strange spots appeared on the display (you know how the trail from the injection is only on the glass). At first sinned that these are broken pixels. Then, thoroughly turning the phone and look at the screen in glasses +1.5, I understood: the glass main display is covered with another layer of thinner glass (I first decided that it was generally a protective film, it was good not to cherish in her ripping, since the borders The linings are perfectly visible, but it is an additional glass screen). So the first disappointment is two points between two glasses, as if microscopic air bubbles.

Then, after three days of the apparatus of the apparatus without a cover, I realized that despite all my "security", the external glass was wildly and incredibly scratched, the scratches appear absolutely at the same place, I was extremely accurate and careful, and the scratches - a bunch of ☹.

And finally, it all ended in that the day before yesterday, the friend of the treacherously slipped out of my hand (everything is unrealistic everything rear panel! Yes, it is beautiful, golden charm, like smeared with oil, especially if the fingers sweat slightly, and for some reason they sweat when I hold the phone, strongly!). In short, the phone fell ☹. Just on the carpet (my untimely revealed experiment three flew to the granite floor, tile and a step from concrete - Monolith! Flint! And here ...). So, after landing on the carpet in the lower right corner (well, he, apparently, met with the floor) went the crack and crossed out the little knocked out - under the protective screen, mostly !!! That is, the touch does not give the feeling of the presence of a crack, the external glass is flat, but the inner cracked and pokold!

I think if someone is not lucky with "Amsterdam" about the stone floor, then the Kirdyk the display will come concrete, he is strongly chlipky ☹. So my home recommendation to avoid trouble - immediately buy to the gadget case, ideally a book to protect the screen, well, or at least a silicone bumper to avoid tragedies of the fall, the back panel is unreal slippery! Covers are full in online stores, provided that you will specify Yandex such a question, in cellular stores the choice of covers is very scoopy, although in the TV2 I found a book book, albeit rough, black ...

Now some comments, not that minuses, just unusual actions other than the previous apparatus, and therefore requiring time to adapt:

  • not very convenient for my taste challenge system;
  • a quiet, muffled (word, not ice) sound player in headphones (only with expensive Sonykovsky "ears" turned out to be an acceptable sound, whereas in the old exposive sound was awesome even with Fitulks from Fixprass for the Fillingman!). Yes, and the sound sound itself could, in my opinion, to be pogromed, Pretched several calls ☹;
  • no battery ☹. There is enough for half a day with absolutely identical uploaded and operating applications in the background (this is not even listening to Mouzon and do not read your instagram). Compare with the previous phone, again - that active use I grabbed from 7 am to the hour of the night approximately, then demanded to "devour" ☺. Immediately to three clocks of the battery - with Gulkin's nose, and the clock in five or six offers to turn on the power saving mode, otherwise, he says to the astral ☹;
  • screen when scrolling pages (for example, I read Twi), for me, unusually slippery, it is difficult to respond - often instead of scrolling the tape opening a post with comments - in a word, somehow tight fingers still communicate with the screen.

But it is rather quit. In general, the device is on 4. If a good cover to it, fix troubles with sound and battery - then in general sweetie! His 6 thousand seems to be! ☺ Something like that!

General characteristics

A type

Decide with the type of device (phone or smartphone?) Quite simple. If you need a simple and inexpensive device for calls and SMS, it is recommended to stop the choice on the phone. The smartphone is more expensive, but offers many diverse options: games, video, Internet, thousands of programs for all occasions. However, his battery life is significantly less than that of a simple phone.

smartphone Operating system (at the top of sales) Android 5.1 Classic Case Type Corps material Plastic control touch buttons Number of SIM cards 2 Mode of operation of several SIM cards Alternate weight 197 g Sizes (shXVXT) 78x157x9 mm

Screen

Screen type color IPS, Touch Touch Screen Type multitouch, capacitive Diagonal 5.5 inch. Image size 1280x720. The number of pixels per inch (PPI) 267 Aspect ratio 16:9

Multimedia features

Number of basic (rear) cameras 1 Permission of the main (rear) camera 13 MP photo list rear, LED Functions primary (rear) cameras Autofocus Record video there is Front-camera there is 5 mp audio mp3 Jack for headphones 3.5 mm

Communication

GSM 900/1800/1900, 3G standard Interfaces

Almost all modern smartphones have Wi-Fi and USB interfaces. A little less thanks are Bluetooth and Irda. Wi-Fi is used to connect to the Internet. USB is used to connect the phone with a computer. Many phones also occur to Bluetooth. It is activated for connecting wireless headphones, To connect the phone with wireless speakers, as well as to transfer files. The smartphone equipped with the IRDA interface can be used as a universal remote control. Slovar terms of the Mobile Phones category

Wi-Fi 802.11n, Bluetooth 2.0, USB Satellite navigation

Built-in GPS and GLONASS modules allow you to determine the coordinates of the phone by signals from satellites. In the absence of GPS modern smartphone can determine its own location by signals from base stations cellular operator. However, finding coordinates on signals from satellites is usually much more accurate. Slovar terms of the terms of mobile phones

GPS.

Memory and processor

CPU

In modern phones and smartphones, special processors are commonly used - SOC (SYSTEM ON CHIP, the system on the chip), in which, in addition to the processor itself, are placed graphic kernel, Memory Controller, I / O Device Controller, etc. Therefore, the processor largely defines a set of functions and device performance.



Reviews on BQ BQS-5505 Amsterdam (Golden)

Truthful reviews about BQs-5505 Amsterdam (Golden) from Saydeks. All reviews of the owners of BQs-5505 Amsterdam (Golden) were pre-verified.

Write a review without registration

07/09/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Unrealically cool graphics, all games go ... Battery giant ...
Cons: no minuses! Buy!
Feedback: 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 with a plus to this smartphone!

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation


Cons: the speaker is not very, but in our time through it no longer listening music. After half a year, the blocking and volume buttons began to fade. Began to constantly hang and lag.
Feedback: Switched to it with Expla Rio Play. The difference is storm. For social Networks and games The phone is suitable perfect. Only the battery is heated. I, as a photographer, was very important the main chamber. Quality photos are beautiful! Upset lags after brief use (only 6 months, suite themselves). In general, I do not advise long use. Not passed and years, but a new one will have to take. I think for the same price you can find something better.

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Cons: Silent speakers, flashlight shines 3 sec

22.12.2017

Shchhar Danik

Evaluation

Pros: Good camera For its price, the screen is worthy, in general, a decent apparatus
Cons: The battery may first be kept normally, but after half a year it is already holding a very weak, the main minus is accessories, this phone has crashed into the bounces, and there are no matrices and other parts for this phone, so you need to take new phone. And of course, a very quiet speaker, even for its price.
Feedback: You can take, but you should wait for the deterioration of some parameters.

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Pluses: I liked the fact that 13mg still this phone perfectly holds games for the example of tanks and so on, I put 5
Cons: Flash breaks very quickly and quiet sound
Feedback: ??????????????

22.12.2017

Khakimov Rustam

Evaluation

Pros: Excellent camera, games loads fast, like everything else, holds charging for a long time
Cons: The flashlight broke, and this is all the phones as I read, the rest, he also breaks.
Quiet speaker, sometimes not even heard that the phone calls
Feedback: I liked the effect of the curved screen, but dropped the phone and the screen crashed, replaced it problematic

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Excellent Smartphone with good characteristics at an affordable price. Wonderful photos with clear contours due to chamber in 13 megapixels. Large IPS screen 5.5 inches with 2,5d technology. Obedient sensor. Bright picture on the screen. It works great with multiple running applications. It does not discharge for a long time thanks to the battery at 2500mach. Smart processor rAM In 1GB and built in 8GB. Support memory card up to 32GB, 2 SIM cards, support 3G. All you need, everything is in this smartphone!
Cons: not detected

22.12.2017

faizullin Arthur

Evaluation

Pros: I really liked the phone. Price and quality at altitude. Very elegant and attractive design of the device. The phone is not cheap making materials. Very comfortable lies in the hand. As for the work, it is also all at the height. Sensitive sensor. The colors are very juicy and bright. There are a lot of colors. I think beautifully. If you even withdraw a photo on a large screen complaints. There is no camera on 13 megapixels. If you need a phone for games and watching movies and not expensive. I think the most. 5.5 inches IPIES screen. Friend bought orders more expensive the phone about the same characteristics. I like it more). Let's take a better Amsterdam and the network better catches than .......... and more pictures. In general, very satisfied with the phone. I advise. Do not wish
Cons: I did not find.

22.12.2017

Yermilova Tatiana

Evaluation

Pros: I use the phone relatively recently, the phone really likes. Offered in the store, as a good alternative to a more expensive brand, the functions are about the same, thanks to the employee who advised him. It is in all
camera 13 MP, photos are clear, suits the picture quality even at night. With a 5.5 IPS screen with a 2.5 D technology screen, even films on the screen, the size is quite suitable, the battery is 2500 mAh keeps the charge of the day. It will respond quickly, the Internet works well, does not slow down, does not freeze. I recommend from myself. Optimal price quality, characteristics.
Cons: shortcomings did not find

22.12.2017

GK Dixis

Evaluation

Pros: Large screen is the main advantage of the smartphone. Also, the brightness of the screen was very surprised, since at competitors this price category is not distinguished by special brightness and color reproduction. Another main chip was the camera of the device, which actually corresponds to the declared and even in the dark, it makes very good pictures. The games are also very good, with such as asphalt, for example, it copes pretty good. And if you play more simple, it copes with them by 5 +. Another screen is very well responding to touch even in the cold. For this price category, I think the phone fully worries his money!
Cons: as if during the monthly use, the shortcomings did not reveal. Regarding the battery, well, here in all smartphones, with maximum use, the phone does not live long, whether it is even samsung who costs 40 kos!)

22.12.2017

Comleva Elena

Evaluation

Pros: Smartphone with large quantity Pluses at an affordable price! Large screen 5.5 inches, and camera 13 MP! Take pictures and view interesting videos - a pleasure! Moreover, the battery capacity allows you to do for a long time! 2500 mAh! Super smartphone!

22.12.2017

matsukova Anna

Evaluation

Pros: I like everything in this model. Big bright screen. Photos are obtained juicy and clear. Camera 13 MPX. It works a month without complaints, the sensor reacts well, very sensitive. I really like the design. Combines white colors with gold.
Cons: shortcomings did not find!
Feedback: Attracts the design, the screen is large and protected by a rotable bent glass that does not scratch, and it looks cool, the screen covered with a high-quality protective film, which saves a rather big screen in a beautiful form. The battery of a good capacity is 2500 mAh, perfectly copes with its task, for the working day with active use enough, and this is the Internet, and video. Camera clear with focus allows you to make cool pictures and videos, and front-camera His quality leaves indifferent to the self-made self. Very smart four nuclear processor. And the big plus to everything is the quality of the assembly and not a high price which pleases. Stile and elegant smartphone at a very reasonable price!

22.12.2017

Sokirko Tatyana

Evaluation

Pluses: A sufficiently large display with a diagonal "5.5" You can watch movies, TV shows and much more in full screen (my Malnky laptop), I use as a portable computer, because it is not convenient to say to the Banduru with it in connection with private travel in Russia and Europe , Camera 13 megapixel 13 meters cuts into the working moments and out, as the pictures with it are obtained by unmatched, you can also print and the quality will be at the height! This model combined the amazing features of shooting modes (Panaaramnaya, night, portrait) which exciteed to goosebumps.
Cons: Would like more capacity acb

22.12.2017

Burkov Alexander

Evaluation

Pros: I bought this model half a year ago, attracted a 5.5 inch screen, thanks to which it was comfortable to watch the video, climb on the Internet. The picture is juicy, contrasting, plus a screen with a technology of 2.5 D. camera 13 MP makes very good pictures with a decent resolution. Focus well, the test captures high quality, everything is read. 2500 mAh battery capacity is enough, with regard to the frequent use of all possible applications and making calls. During the time the use did not brake and did not buggy. The smartphone acquitted all my expectations, so take, you will not regret!
Cons: No.

22.12.2017

Glukhova Elena

Evaluation

Pros: - the camera corresponds to the stated;
- smart 3G Internet (megaphone and tele2 operators);
- bright, juicy screen;
- not badly holds the battery at moderate use;
- speed at the expense of a good processor;
- Stunning design, especially in gold color.
Cons: Unfortunately, there is no indicator alerts.
Feedback: This device took mom, she is not the first smartphone, but she wanted something new, with big screen. By taking this model, I realized that the option is excellent. Passed for 6490 in the Samara region. Covers from iPhone 6+ are suitable practically like relatives.
The incomparable design, conveniently lies in the hand, excellent viewing angles, screen 5.5 "allows you to even view movies. Thanks to the battery at 2500 mAh, it keeps the charge well. The camera corresponds to the stated, both the main and selfie. Stunning color reproduction takes pictures clear, bright and juicy. Excellent speaker, without any noise and interference. Speed \u200b\u200bis also very pleased, steadily works with several running applications without any rolling. Mom has been satisfied!

22.12.2017

Ivanova Olesya

Evaluation

Pluses: The design is cool, you will not think that there is a cover, but it is. Exactive color reproduction. The time the use did not slow down and did not buggy. Dynamics of average volume. The curves of the screen review are maximized, under the inclination the picture is slightly pale.

22.12.2017

Frolova Olga

Evaluation

Pros: Stylish smartphone with excellent performance at an affordable price. The total colorful photos with clear contours thanks to the chamber in 13pm. Selfi photo will also please you with your quality. Large IPS screen in 5,5 detects with technology 2,5d.Prust sensor. On the screen. With ease, it works with several running applications. It is discharged for a long time due to the battery at a 2500mach. SCRESS processor, 1GB RAM and embedded in 8GB excellent characteristics for quick and accurate work installed programs and applications. Support memory card up to 32GB, 2 SIM cards, support 3G.All what you need, everything is in this smartphone!
Cons: No.

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Price, Large screen, Battery, Camera, Design
Feedback: The price corresponds to the quality. Immediately attracted the design, the screen is large and protected by a rotable bent glass that does not scratch, and it looks cool. Battery of a large capacity, perfectly copes with its task, for the working day with active use enough, and this is the Internet, and video. The camera is clear with focusing allows you to make cool snapshots and videos, and the front camera did not leave me indifferent to the selfie. The smartphone itself looks elegant and premium for such a cost.

22.12.2017

Zamytina Elena

Evaluation

Pros: I like everything in this model. Big bright screen. Photos are obtained juicy and clear. The camera is 13 mpx in it. It works 3 months without glitches, the sensor reacts well. I really like the design. Combines white colors with gold. It looks rich and stylish.
Cons: not found

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: a great smartphone that will delight from the beginner to experienced userSince he is simple in handling well in his hand. In this case, it has 5.5 inch IPS a bright display with a technology of 2.5 D. Very beautiful 13 megapixyl camera transmitting the whole range of colors. Very capacious battery 2500 mAh, with which it is not scary to forget the charge at home as it is enough for a very long time. Two SIM cards, and not bad and very smart four nuclear processor. And the big plus to everything is the quality of the assembly and not the high price that pleases.
Cons: no.

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Pros: The camera is excellent for such a modest price, in the hand lies well, two SIM cards, a large and bright screen
Cons: everything suits

22.12.2017

Hasanov Alikhan

Evaluation

Pros: a chic apparatus, the camera is very pleased with 13 megacles, the screen can not leave the indifferent 5.5 IPS screen with the technole of the 2.5 D, the battery is 2500 mAh is cool!

22.12.2017

Kosheleva Marina

Evaluation

Pros: Cool Smarfon Model! I'm just delighted! 5.5 inches IPS screen with 2.5 D technology. Very stylish and fashionable gadget with a battery capacity of 2500 mAh, which allows you to work at the same time running applications for a long time. Bright cameras with autofocus, snapshots are just cool. Support for two SIM cards in 3G format. Pretty good gadget for the money.

Cons: I have no deficiencies, there are no shortcomings)

22.12.2017

Homyakov Alexander

Evaluation

Pluses: This is not a phone. This is one huge + gorgeous camera 13 MP, very beautiful screen 5.5 IPS with a 2.5 D technology, the battery is 2500 mAh is not much but for this handsome enough enough.
Cons: there is no manufacturer made a great phone and asks a very no longer amount

22.12.2017

Gorbushin Dmitiyry

Evaluation

Pros: Large 5.5 "Bright Display, with IPS matrix, good battery and low price. Not bad camera. Perfect option for such a value

22.12.2017

Klyuev Irina

Evaluation

Pros: Hello everyone! Two weeks ago bought myself new smartphone, and sprinkled. Wishes were such:

Big screen
Good camera
Many memory
And all in the budget version
The seller immediately suggested Amsterdam.
At a price of only 6.890р !!
The model is presented in classic colors. The factory protective film is pasted.
According to the manufacturer of the smartphone, compare the possibilities with a personal computer.
What I personally was convinced.
Android operating system 5.1. For me more comfortable than 6.0
On the wallpaper probably Amsterdam) very beautiful.
immediately connected Yandex with voice search
Two SIMs, a memory card up to 32 GB, as well as 1GB RAM, built-in 8. As one knowledgeable person told me, "no more."
In general, I am pleased)
Cons: deficiencies I have not yet noticed. Soviet to purchase, you will not regret it)

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: 13 MP, 5.5 IPS Screen with 2.5 D technology, 2500 mAh battery
Cons: No.

22.12.2017

Klimov Ilya

Evaluation

Pros: price, camera, large display.
Cons: Very quiet speaker, if you are on the street a call can not be heard.
Feedback: I used about a year, for the price more than satisfied, but a trouble happened, the phone dropped the spouse, surprisingly the display remained whole, broke a piece of plastic near the camera. He began to search for glass, but in Novosibirsk did not find, ordered on Ali, when the glass disconnects the glass damaged the display itself, had to order a new again on Ali.
It is bad that even the official SC cannot change the display, repair only under warranty.

22.12.2017

Yanykin Tatiana

Evaluation

Pros: Size, Settings, Design
Cons: Battery, non-highlighted buttons, cameras do not match the specified pixels
Review: I see a lot of reviews about what the screen bursts, how is it myself so in my own way? Is it really worth expecting all the baikus?

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pluses: phone bomb) I use more than a year not one problem) Flash Yes, when it works when there is no, but generally the phone is super))
Cons: broke the screen thrown out! Since it is not in one service there are no details on them!
Review: games, surfing on the Internet, movies, but anything standing phone your money)))

22.12.2017

Asrey Mirza

Evaluation

Cons: All of these BQs have a defect, sooner or later an outbreak will arrive and no one will fix it, I do not advise these Chinese phones.

22.12.2017

Khokhlov Ilya

Evaluation

Pros: - Large screen with acceptable HD resolution
- not a chip
- Do not overheat
Cons: - a terrible camera (normally takes pictures only with good light). If there is a lack of light photos are very dark (although you take pictures in the afternoon). When using a flash - shooting is late, that is, the flash has worked and the light has already left and only after the snapshot is fixed. What is the point in such an outbreak and camera? It was before that LG (D686) also in this budget - but the camera removed much better. Just "sky" and "earth" compared to data BQ.
- Insufficient battery capacity. The smartphone is very quickly "liquefies", again comparing with LG D686 - keeps almost two times worse, although the battery capacity of the LG was not twice as much (3150 mA? H)
- There are sudden unfortunate reboots of the phone. Very rare, but there are. Pleasant little.
Feedback: To this smartphone, two years have passed from LG D686, which I really liked (easy with an excellent camera and a good battery, a bright display and balanced characteristics) - but at one very very moment he "died", as it turned out "died" microha memory. Repair is not appropriate.
As usual, no one planned the upcoming financial expenses for the acquisition of a smartphone, so I began to look for a budget option with acceptable characteristics and more or less adequate reviews. I came across the BQS-5505 Amsterdam, I read and went on the same day and bought.
And although U. this phone a lot of minuses, but I catch myself thinking that if now I was given to choose a re-budget smart, then it would most likely stopped again on it: (

Now, if I had a little more money at that time, there would be a completely different story)))) And so in this money (up to 6 thousand rubles) there are no other options).
If you are limited in the budget - then buy this unit, you will most likely not find any likely.

22.12.2017

Quiet Katerina

Evaluation

Pros: does not slow down, not buggy, batteries for a day
Cons: Flash stopped working after 4 months of use
Feedback: Overall a good phone

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Pros: - price!
- Appearance
- Large screen, bright juicy colors.
- camera
Cons: - The battery quickly discharges
Review: I took in August for 6000 rubles. For such a price, it looks just fine, for the male palm the thing is that (for a female hand, it will probably be too cumbersome and heavy). Large screen diagonal 5.5, bright colors, although the sun is still poorly visible. Normal speaker, by 50% everything is perfectly audible. Installed applications Do not brake, quickly open.

The only minus - the battery simply catastrophically sits down, even with all the power saving settings included! And I still do not play on the phone, I do not watch the video - 10 minutes to extract the wall of VKontakte, write a couple of messages, check mail - and 15-20% charge as it did not happen! The fact that in the description to the phone was declared up to 6 hours of video viewing ... Well, yes, like :)) So here or constantly carry charging with you, or an external battery.

If you like to play on the phone, watch the video, read on the road - and at the same time do not carry extra battery with you, it is better to look at other smartphones.
If you just need to call, check mail, step in social networks, make some pictures in instagram and search for something on the Internet - quite a suitable device, enough for the work day.

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Magnificent IPS display, 4 kernels, big screen, price, price and times price!
Cons: Battery is weak, but for the day there is enough.
Feedback: Tube chic, especially with regard to its price! Nothing slows down, it doesn't bug, everything is clear, the screen is shine! I bought three such pipes and presented aunt one. I didn't find the tube. And for me so at all It is not better for her, because It performs all the functions that I need and worth a penny! The first device I bought a new one for 4500r, the second same, the third took B.U. For 3000.This I bought for 5000. In general, I want to say that there are two different assemblies and they differ among themselves and external species and the quality, even the box is different. In general, take only the one that has a small red BQ icon, those who have a major inscription BQ in the middle, they are buggy, apparently affects the assembly.

22.12.2017

Auka Auka

Evaluation

Pros: price, quality, performance
Cons: not yet found
Feedback: For your money it is better not to find

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Large screen - day can be seen in the sun, bright, the phone is fast, in the hand lies well. Read comfortable, the battery is enough for 1-2 days.
Cons: - GPS Navigation is weak, when used together with cellular connection - sometimes falls off and is lost (somehow at the most appropriate moment), and Yandex Navigator does not go on it - some problems and glitches;
- Speaker quiet - if in the car - then you can skip the call if the video is played out on the street - it will not be heard;
- and when updating the air - turned into a brick - she passed under warranty - thought a common problem, no - only mine can be seen.
Feedback: I used about 2-3 months - as a whole, the device is very pleased. The hearing is good, the battery was enough for 1.5 days - provided the Internet, read, call (the Internet did not turn off - all the time - Watsap, Mail, Viber, photo sending and receiving). Somehow began to slow down - I threw it from a dozen installed programs - and everything helped (taking into account that about 15 there was still left). Enjoyed not a standard ring. After the update, it stopped turning on - it writes no file. Waiting for an answer from the service. A very interesting form of the phone - at the beginning they were asked - it is not the iPhone 6 - well, very similar.

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: for this money it is better not to find
Cons: The battery sits faster than I expected, in active use from 8 am to 23 pm, 10% remained, video, games, the Internet, the dialer almost without not releasing from the hands.
Review: a decent screen and camera for this money

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Pros: Magnificent cameras - the main and frontal! HD screen. Speed \u200b\u200b3G. The battery keeps at least 8 hours active use. And many more
Cons: the speaker is not very, but in our time through it no longer listening music.
Feedback: Switched to it with Expla Rio Play. The difference is storm. Beautiful budget smartphone. Soc. Networks and games The phone is suitable perfect. Only the battery is heated. I, as a photographer, was very important the main chamber. Quality photos are beautiful! I advise !!!

22.12.2017

Ruda Victoria

Evaluation

Pros: smart, big display, long holding battery charge 5-7 hours.
Cons: heated when used
Feedback: bought a smartphone. I use the second day neatly, I did not endure from the house. Lies calmly. A crack appeared on the display. There was no blows, did not drop. Over time, the crack has grown. We think the factory marriage, but when you buy crack noted.

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: screen well and pretty smart
Cons: The battery sits in front of 3-4 hours
Review: Who has a weak sound to go to the engineering menu there you can configure everything if it were not for 5+, only 4

22.12.2017

Bezless Svetlana

Evaluation

Pros: Beautiful model, comfortably lies in hand, easy to use, smart. The charge holds normally for me. In the evening I charged, from seven hours I began to use (sit in social networks) and lasted until eleven watches. An excellent film is already on the phone.
A lot of "smart gestures".
Cons: When listening to music quickly sits down.
Feedback: In general, the phone is excellent. I do not know whether the covers from iPhon 6+ are suitable, did not try, but the covers can be found on Aliexpress.com at a affordable price.

22.12.2017

Max Winds

Evaluation

Pros: very juicy and large screen, naturally price, Android 5.1, Spanish brand, high-quality assembly.
Cons: Battery.
Review: For such a price, of course, it is impossible to choose for such a price, but still ... the camera takes off at all, as it shows ... The battery holds very little (2 calls in a minute and frequent correspondence in the walker, the total of 8 hours of work). For this price, it is only picky. I don't find better for this price, at the moment I'm just satisfied with it, if it were not for the battery, it would be almost perfect, although I repeat that for this price it is the best!

22.12.2017

data hidden

Evaluation

Pros: camera, screen, efficiency, price
Cons: no "native" accessories
Feedback: Large cool bright apparatus for small money. I use a month, does not slow down, everything is normal. The camera for this price category is decent, especially with normal lighting, the sound is also good. I recommend confidently.
Only the absence of native covers, I am going to buy from 6C too

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: I liked everything except the battery
Cons: Battery.
Feedback: Good smartphone

22.12.2017

Ivanov Evgeny

Evaluation

Pros: Great phone for your money. Cameras are perfectly removed. Scran bright, big. Androyd 5.1. What the design reminds iPhone 6
Cons: not yet discovered

22.12.2017

Belov Mikhail

Evaluation

Pros: I join all who sewed this animal. Week Yuzayu his full delight!
Cons: not yet discovered.
Reviewed by: reading reviews about this miracle, I decided to purchase. I almost regret. Bought immediately case, from Phoni + 6 in Ashans for 199 rubles. It came up as a native slightly finalized and all the rules. I advise you to purchase. This is the best combination price-quality.

22.12.2017

Dmitry Shapovalov

Evaluation

Pluses: Well, just a month from the moment of purchase, I will say that for such a funny price and such a superstive quality I have not yet met, does not slow down, it does not fly away, the camera is simply achmut, the wrongly beautiful smart, and overwhelming the big IPS screen.
Cons: for the month of operation did not reveal.
Feedback: Quadratic, Practic, Hood !!!

22.12.2017

Mikheeva Antonina

Evaluation

Pros: design, camera, price
Cons: No
Review: cool smartphone and at 100.000.000.000 times better than iPhone

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pluses: camera awesome
Cons: no not good
Feedback: Good smartphone for the money, very much like the camera as the main one and the front, quickly reacts, keeps a long battery.
Operational and built-in memory are pleasing.
It is not a pity to give money for this phone.
The shortcomings did not find!
Probably one of best models The company!

12/22/2017 Evaluation

Pros: Like a large and bright screen. For such a price I did not expect to work so quickly. A friend has the same phone, he advised me to take. I do not regret buying.
Cons: no 4G and covers
Feedback: Why take an iPhone with a price tag 10 times more if I get the same with this phone too?